In his closing remarks at the Accra Reset in Addis Ababa, President John Dramani Mahama made a bold declaration, committing that by 2030, no raw mineral ores or unprocessed cocoa beans would leave Ghana’s shores.
This declaration attracted a resounding applause since he touched a long-standing national nerve. For decades, the country has exported value and imported poverty. The country has been shipping out raw materials while buying back finished goods at a premium.
For many Ghanaians and Africans, this commitment is bold. It is also transformative. However, between ambition and execution lies a hard political and economic terrain that cannot be wished away.
A Break from the Colonial Economic Model
Ghana’s economic structure has historically revolved around what historians and economists describe as the “Guggisberg Economic Model”. It is centred around primary commodity exports such as cocoa, gold, bauxite, manganese, and, more recently, iron ore.
The value chain has largely been captured abroad. President Mahama’s commitment seeks to break this vicious pattern that has impoverished Ghana and many other African countries and enriched the West.
Per this proposal, the strategy is to retain value locally, create skilled jobs, build industrial capacity, and strengthen the cedi through higher-value exports
For instance, in the cocoa sector, the vision is to deepen local processing. The country already has installed processing capacity of about 400,000 tonnes, yet much of its cocoa is exported raw due to financing arrangements tied to international buyers.
However, there are some hard questions around this commitment that need to be addressed. Breaking an economic structure that has existed since the colonial era will not come cheaply. There will be hurdles, and how the country positions itself to overcome these hurdles will largely determine the materialization of this commitment.
The Financing Question: Can Ghana Fund Its Own Ambition?
One of the most striking aspects of President Mahama’s proposal is to enhance local processing capacity to add value to the raw resources. However, it is a no-brainer that industrialisation is capital-intensive.
The country will need modern and fit-for-purpose processing plants for turning bauxite into alumina, manganese into refined alloys, iron ore into steel, cocoa into semi-finished and finished products, among others.
This will require billions of dollars in long-term investment.
The question becomes unavoidable: Does the government have the fiscal space? Can domestic capital markets absorb such bond issuances sustainably?
Ghana’s recent debt restructuring experience underscores the fragility of public finances. Industrialisation requires patient capital, something in short supply in a high-interest-rate environment. The success of this commitment demands sound financing engineering, else it will still remain on paper.
Existing Contracts and International Commitments
Another major hurdle lies in contractual realities. Ghana already has long-term offtake agreements with international commodity traders and refiners. Many of these agreements underpin financing arrangements and bilateral trade relationships.
This means that unilaterally shifting away from raw exports may trigger contractual disputes, affect sovereign credibility, and strain trade partnerships
Local industrial policy cannot operate in isolation from international trade law and agreements. The transition must therefore be negotiated carefully rather than declared abruptly.
Will Local Industry Rise to the Occasion?
Processing locally is one thing and processing with local expertise, technology, and ownership is another. Industrial success depends on reliable power supply, efficient ports, stable macroeconomic environment, skilled labour, access to affordable credit etc.
Without these fundamentals, local processing risks becoming inefficient and uncompetitive, requiring continuous state subsidies.
The private sector must therefore play a central role. Yet Ghana’s industrial base remains relatively shallow. The challenge is whether local entrepreneurs and firms can scale quickly enough to absorb minerals and agricultural output at volumes matching current exports.
Resistance from Entrenched Interests
Commodity trade is not a neutral space. It is dominated by powerful international firms and well-connected domestic actors. These include companies that currently finance cocoa purchases, control mineral offtake agreements, manage shipping logistics etc.
These means that some individuals and organizations have built business models around raw exports.
Any disruption to this structure, which will threaten their business is likely face resistance, whether through lobbying, capital withdrawal, or market pressure.
It is therefore crucial that such interest are well-managed to do away with possible sabotage and other threats
The Political Continuity Test
One characteristic of local transformative policies is that they normally lack durability. Many well-intended transformative policies do not go beyond the term of governments that introduced them. Ones initiators leave office, the policy dies with them. A classical case in the country is the One District, One Factory Initiative.
2030 extends beyond a single presidential term. Ghana’s political system is competitive and policy reversals are not uncommon after electoral transitions.
If the next administration does not share the same ideological commitment, the agenda could stall midway, leaving partially completed factories and stranded investments.
For the policy to survive, it must evolve from a presidential pledge into a bipartisan national industrial compact.
The Bottomline
The background to this President Mahama’s commitment is the current crisis in the country’s cocoa sector. The government has been forced to cut cocoa pricing for farmers due to falling international prices and exchange rate shifts.
The development reveals the vulnerability of over-dependence on commodity. Economists have always maintained that processing locally could cushion such shocks by diversifying revenue streams beyond raw exports.
There is little doubt that banning raw material exports is visionary. It speaks to dignity, industrial sovereignty and generational opportunity. But bold declarations do not automatically dismantle structural constraints.
The journey will be long and bumpy with many hurdles, is the country ready to pay the price?
