As the government moves forward with the Ghana Gold Board (GoldBod) agenda to sanitize the nation’s gold sector, financial management consultant Charles Kwesi Mensah is warning that the initiative’s success hinges on rigorous risk mitigation and institutional integrity. While the proposed “GoldBod” aims to centralize gold purchasing to curb smuggling and boost foreign exchange reserves, public interest has intensified regarding how the state will manage the inherent risks of such a massive intervention.
The Blueprint for Mitigation
In a Facebook post analysis of the policy, Mr. Mensah argues that while the rationale for GoldBod is sound, the board faces a complex array of operational, governance, and market risks. To prevent the board from becoming another burdened state institution, he proposes a robust framework for success centered on a hybrid market structure. This approach would allow the state to regulate and centralize exports without completely crowding out private sector players, thereby maintaining healthy competition and market efficiency.
Furthermore, Mensah emphasizes that in the modern global economy, digital traceability systems are non-negotiable. Such systems would ensure that every gram of gold purchased from artisanal and small-scale miners (ASM) is accounted for, meeting international Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards.
Financial and Institutional Safeguards
To protect the board from the volatility of global gold prices, the consultant calls for ring-fenced financing. This specialized financial structure would ensure that funds intended for gold purchasing are protected and utilized efficiently, providing the board with the liquidity needed to offer fair, benchmark-linked pricing to local miners. However, the most critical element remains a miner-centric process. By focusing on the needs of the small-scale mining community, GoldBod can incentivize formalization, making it more attractive for miners to sell to the state rather than through illicit informal channels.
A Strategic Tool, Not a Silver Bullet
Concluding his assessment, Mr. Mensah reminds stakeholders that the establishment of GoldBod is a strategic policy tool rather than a “silver bullet” for the industry’s woes. He stresses that the ultimate outcome will be determined by disciplined execution, moving from policy theory to effective field operations, and institutional integrity to ensure the board operates transparently. Ultimately, the goal is to maintain a productive synergy between state oversight and private sector dynamism to ensure the “gold drain” is transformed into a sustainable national gain.
IMF and BoG Claims on Losses
In its fifth staff review report, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlighted that operational costs from GoldBod and trading shortfalls were the primary causes of a US$214 million loss in the Bank of Ghana’s (BoG) Gold-for-Reserves (G4R) programme during the first nine months of 2025. According to the Fund, these deficits were largely driven by trading losses in artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) transactions and off-taker fees associated with GoldBod’s operations.
However, the Bank of Ghana has dismissed the IMF’s “exposure loss” claims as premature. The Central Bank argues that because its 2025 audited financials have not yet been published, it is unfair to definitively link its current financial standing to GoldBod. Central Bank officials have further suggested that any fluctuations in gains or losses are more likely a reflection of dynamic global market conditions rather than specific exposure to the Gold Board.
As the BoG prepares to publish its audited figures to clarify the situation, reports from Joy Business indicate a major policy shift: the Bank of Ghana is set to officially exit the small-scale gold trading business on January 1, 2026. This move will see the Bank cede the ASM segment entirely to GoldBod, allowing the regulator to refocus on its core mandate of inflation targeting and price stability.
