Dr. John Kissi, Chief Executive of the Hydrological Authority of Ghana, informed the Parliamentary Assurance Committee that the country would require $5 billion to effectively address its persistent flooding problems. This figure is based on an extensive analysis of the severity and impact of flooding incidents across Ghana.
Flooding is a recurring issue in Ghana, particularly during the rainy season, with urban areas such as Accra, Kumasi, and Takoradi being the hardest hit. These floods cause extensive damage to property and infrastructure, and often result in loss of life. The problem is exacerbated by insufficient or poorly maintained drainage systems, which are frequently clogged with silt, debris, and waste, making them unable to cope with heavy rainfall.
In his presentation to the committee, Dr. Kissi explained that the $5 billion would fund comprehensive measures, including the improvement and expansion of drainage systems, construction of flood defenses, upgrading infrastructure, and implementing effective urban planning and waste management practices. These initiatives aim to tackle the root causes of flooding, such as inadequate drainage, unplanned urbanization, and the impacts of climate change, including increased rainfall intensity. The Hydrological Authority emphasized the need for significant investment and coordinated efforts between government agencies, local communities, and international partners to mitigate Ghana’s recurrent flooding issues.
While questions have been raised about the feasibility of securing such a large sum, the scope of the problem justifies the estimated cost. The $5 billion figure reflects the scale of the investment needed for a comprehensive solution, including infrastructure upgrades, flood defenses, early warning systems, and potentially relocating communities from high-risk areas.
Ghana’s ability to secure the necessary funding will depend on the government’s success in sourcing funds from the national budget, loans, grants, and partnerships with international organizations like the World Bank, IMF, or other donor agencies.
A phased approach to funding and implementation may be more practical, prioritizing the most critical areas first.
