The long-simmering dispute over DStv subscription prices in Ghana has reached a critical inflection point, with the National Communications Authority (NCA) formally issuing a 30-day suspension notice to MultiChoice Ghana, citing pricing practices deemed contrary to public interest.
In a statement released Wednesday, August 7, 2025, the NCA invoked Section 13 of the Electronic Communications Act, 2008 (Act 775), which empowers the regulator to act where a licensee’s operations are found to undermine consumer welfare.
The NCA has also given the company a month to respond, file objections, or propose remedial actions to avert a full suspension of its Pay TV Direct-to-Home Bouquet authorization.
The regulatory crackdown follows weeks of public outcry and policy friction between MultiChoice, operators of DStv, and the Minister for Communications, Samuel Nartey George, who has accused the South African-owned broadcaster of “disregarding the economic hardship” faced by Ghanaian households.

Sam George has consistently framed the issue as a matter of consumer justice, blasting DStv’s 15% subscription hike in April 2025 despite favourable macroeconomic trends, including a 10% appreciation of the Ghanaian cedi, falling inflation, and lower fuel prices.
“The essence of my action is to see Ghanaians pay a fair price for the services offered, for far too long, corporations have fleeced the Ghanaian people. There has been a RESET, and it demands a new style of public service that is fiercely protective of the Ghanaian people.” Sam George said.
The Minister further revealed a confidential proposal by MultiChoice during negotiations. He said the company had offered to retain its current high pricing but agreed not to repatriate revenues to its headquarters — a move he rejected as “illogical.”
“How does this proposal solve the real issue?” he asked. “Anything outside of a price reduction is tangential and of no consequence.”
MultiChoice Pushes Back
MultiChoice Ghana, however, argued that a 30% price cut, as demanded by the Minister, is “not tenable” given rising content licensing fees, infrastructure costs, and operational realities.
In a statement signed by Managing Director Alex Okyere, the company warned that enforced reductions could result in job losses and service degradation, affecting customers more than helping them.
“We remain committed to regulatory compliance and open to further dialogue,” the company said, while stressing that current pricing reflects the quality of content and services offered to subscribers.
MultiChoice also pointed to the lack of viable local competition and the high cost of satellite broadcasting in the region as structural constraints that limit flexibility in pricing.
Regulatory Power vs. Market Dynamics
Analysts say the standoff presents a stress test for Ghana’s regulatory environment, raising questions about how far the government can and should go in directing private sector pricing, especially in markets with monopoly or oligopoly dynamics.
While some support Minister George’s assertive stance, others caution that unilateral regulatory actions may deter foreign direct investment and lead to unintended economic consequences.
What’s Next?
With the 30-day countdown now active, stakeholders await MultiChoice’s formal response. Industry watchers speculate that a tiered pricing model, loyalty-based discounts, or increased transparency could form part of a negotiated compromise allowing both sides to save face and protect consumer interest.
For now, Ghanaian subscribers, many of whom have long expressed dissatisfaction with DStv’s pricing, remain caught in the middle, hoping that the unfolding drama delivers more affordable access to the content they love, without risking total blackout or degraded service quality.
The outcome of this battle will not only determine the future of MultiChoice Ghana but may also set a precedent for how digital consumer rights are protected in Ghana’s evolving regulatory ecosystem.
