Tomorrow, November 5, 2024, Americans will cast their ballots to determine their next president. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump are locked in a high-stakes, close race. Beyond U.S. borders, the outcome could have profound consequences, especially for Africa, where each candidate’s policies offer vastly different economic opportunities.
As the Democratic nominee, Kamala Harris has built her campaign on progressive policies with a vision to deepen U.S.-Africa ties. Harris advocates investments in technology, climate resilience, and sustainable partnerships to drive economic development across Africa. Her approach continues the Biden administration’s efforts to foster enduring relationships with African nations, prioritizing development through collaboration.
On the other hand, Donald Trump, the Republican candidate, is seeking a return to office with a focus on strategic, interest-based partnerships. Known for his transactional style, Trump’s previous administration worked to curb China’s influence in Africa and centered its policies on securing U.S. interests through targeted economic alliances rather than widespread development programs.
With polls too close to call, analysts expect the race to hinge on turnout and swing states like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where margins remain razor-thin.
The Candidates’ Economic Policies and Their Implications for Africa
Harris proposes policies that could drive transformative economic progress across Africa. Among her key initiatives is a plan to double digital connectivity on the continent by 2030, achieved through partnerships with the African Development Bank and private players like Mastercard.
Harris also promises $7 billion in commitments to help African nations adapt to climate change, underscoring a comprehensive strategy focused on sustainable infrastructure, digital access, and climate resilience.
If Harris wins, Africa’s digital and green economies could see unprecedented growth, bolstered by infrastructure development and long-term partnerships. Her policies align closely with Africa’s goals for modernization and sustainability, potentially creating a foundation for economic stability across sectors like agriculture, renewable energy, and information technology.
In contrast, Trump’s policy toward Africa reflects a pragmatic, strategic vision, prioritizing partnerships that mutually benefit U.S. and African interests. His approach is grounded in select economic and security collaborations, with a strong focus on countering China’s influence.
While this strategy could offer targeted gains in areas like trade and security, it may not deliver the comprehensive development and infrastructure benefits Africa needs.
A Trump presidency would likely see continued selective engagement, where mutual benefits drive U.S.-Africa relations without extensive development commitments. African countries could expect economic partnerships where they align with U.S. interests but would need to look elsewhere for broader developmental support.
