- Parliament approved the $900M project in 2020, allocating funds for hydropower, irrigation, and solar energy.
- The Finance Ministry pledged $91M but diverted funds, leaving only $12M disbursed.
- The project became a political scandal, fueling the ORAL anti-corruption initiative.
- Lenders like the World Bank refused funding, citing high costs and inefficiencies.
- Ghana breached contract terms, leading to penalties and legal liabilities.
- Instead of refunds, the contractor demands an extra $12M for unpaid invoices.
- Politicians exaggerated benefits—flood prevention, drinking water, and cheap electricity were never part of the design.
- Key policy trade-offs were ignored, making the project costly but impractical.
- Canceling the contract without legal resolution risks arbitration and financial losses.
- Ghana’s governance challenges persist—politics dominates policy, leading to wasteful projects and weak accountability.
Read more at: Pwalugu Dam & political “loot” recovery (ORAL) in Ghana – THE SCARAB
So what?
“Fundamental to the process of lowering waste is the need to raise the stakes for politicians in high-resource policy decision-making. For that to happen, a critical mass of citizens must be as energised by policy options and tensions as the masses are about partisan politics in Ghana.” Bright Simons