Ghana’s 41st National Farmers’ Day has been launched under the theme “Eat Ghana, Grow Ghana, Secure the Future.” But the main challenge facing the sector today is not farmer effort or lack of technical knowledge, it is the absence of a structure that investors and lenders consider bankable.
Capital does not follow patriotic messaging or award ceremonies, it follows proof of low risk, enforceable contracts, and predictable returns. If this year’s Farmers’ Day is to change anything, it must mark a shift from recognition to investment readiness.
Investors, banks, and DFIs (Development Finance Institutions) do not finance good intentions; they finance systems they can trust. Agriculture in Ghana is still too fragmented, too exposed to weather and price swings and too weak on traceability and contracts to attract large finance.
That weakness is already visible in the seed market. Experts, including Dr. Yaw Osei-Asare, an agricultural economist at the University of Ghana, warn that counterfeit and poor-quality seeds are cutting yields and distorting farm economics. Although seed labels claim near-perfect germination, farmers often see as low as 60 % in the field.
Over several acres, the financial losses are significant and make cashflow unpredictable. Imported seeds also often perform poorly in Ghana’s climate compared to locally adapted ones, which raises the perceived risk for investors.
Government has announced plans to deploy 5,000 agriculture and veterinary graduates to support farmers with modern practices. While helpful, this will not by itself unlock capital unless the new support is tied to structured value chains with known buyers, insurance, enforceable contracts, and data that lenders can underwrite. Training without commercial structure does not change investor behaviour.
Modernisation in agriculture now has to mean more than new tools. It must mean integration into a financeable system with offtake contracts, insurance, warehousing and logistics. Technology that is not tied to actual commerce does not reduce the risk profile of the sector and therefore does not trigger investment.
Food security is also a market design question. Without insurance, storage, and risk-sharing mechanisms, climate shocks translate into fiscal shocks and food shortages. A system that spreads risk through proper instruments can produce stability regardless of weather or subsidies.
The same is true for productivity. Domestic crops will only replace imports when they are cheaper, more reliable, and consistent in quality, not when consumers are simply urged to buy local. Productivity without market access is wasted. Market access without productivity is fragile.
For this year’s Farmers’ Day to have real economic value, it must send a new signal that the country is shifting from celebration to capital readiness. The money that could scale Ghanaian agriculture exists, but it is waiting for structure, not slogans. The task now is to build the architecture that capital is willing to price.
